Have I mentioned today that the best way to end this thing is for all of us to refrain from visiting and commenting on the good Doctor's site?
STOP COMMENTING!
If you know someone commenting there, please get the word out!
STOP DAMMIT, just stop.
posted by Sinner @ 4:15 PM
31 comments
31 Comments:
Sorry.
The addiction is stronger than I would have believed, but I'm getting help.
I promise to watch here instead.
so, sinner - which sins are committed by commenting there?
Fear? (if I don't try, her downfall will be my fault?)
pride? (I can help her see reason where all others have failed)
anger? (whackjob needs a nudge over the edge)
vanity? (maybe she'll post my comment. Maybe she'll even reply to it!)
Gluttony? (I can't help myself; it's addictive)
lust? (don't care what y'all say, the crazy ones are kinda hot)
that other one? (I'm a n00b - need to sin more, I guess.)
In any case, agreed - feedin the beast at the source only keeps the crazy train rolling. She seems to shrivel in the absence of feedback.
Maybe the folks in EWWW, GENE have the right idea - set up the drum corps next to the whackjob microphone. Talk all you want, Deb; we'll make sure the rest of society doesn't need to hear you.
it IS hard though, sometimes.
i've managed to stay away for the entire weekend, but just went back and noticed her complete disregard for the copyright of JG's law firm's website.
she posted a photo lifted from that site of JG's attorney.
under the heading, "visualize whirled c***quest," she wrote:
"Man, oh, man. This is really starting to be fun. No more biatch-slapping sissy baw. Well, not too much more. I got me two real men now.
1. Matthew Heidt, former navy seal, a.k.a. froggy@blackfive. he da man that propagated the lies and posted al kaszniak's email and my ephing home address in tucson for a while (trying to incite wingnuts to rape/murder dykes - way to go mattman!) I plan to pursue attempts to have the navy seals issue mr. heidt a retroactive dishonorable discharge as time permits.
2. Paul Lewis, an attorney at Moye/White, a 30 year old institution in Denver, colorado.
Mr. Lewis has a little picture, blurb and resume at the illustrious Moye/White website. He describes his expertise as follows:
In the past few years, Paul Lewis' multi-faceted practice has focused principally on representing employers in labor and employment matters. Representing national, regional and local employers, he handles a spectrum of issues from administrative proceedings through court trials, and advises clients on employment relationships. Paul also writes and frequently lectures on employment law and related legal issues.
His quote: Visualize world conquest!
He is a Member of Colorado Bar Association's Internet Task Force (!) yet demonstrates utter cluelessness in his sissy-snarky letter to me.
Touche, monsieur loo ees!
Patterico - prepare to verify ISP addresses. Ace of Spades, triangulate location using GPS data!
Hombres, let the games begin."
only after a commenter noted the site's copyright policy did she add this:
"[NOTE regarding photographic reproduction: copyright and all other rights, claims, privileges pursuant to this image et cetera ad nauseum are the EXCLUSIVE property of Moye/White. This picture was downloaded from this site, click on Paul Lewis. Said sorry-ass law firm retains all rights pursuant to this photo of a dude in a bow-tie (how kute!). Puh-leaze don't sue ma ass for copyright infringement. okay, hombres?"
i hope they slap her down hard, with everything they've got, given that their copyright allows for printing or downloading for informational purposes only.
it's hard to believe someone this stupid and self destructive actually made it through a phd program at penn.
i wonder if her phd is not the result of extortion or bribery?
sorry sinner. i didn't scroll down far enough on the main page to see you had already posted most of what i just posted as a comment.
oops.
won't happen again. because i'm not going to her site again.
Actually, she had that stupid comment up first.
I posted the entire text, becuase I believe the law firm was stating you must use the copyright symbol.
And they made it quite easy to do so, but, hey we all know she's smarter than they are. And way more legally savvy!
So far I've managed to resist commenting on the little crazy person's blog, but it's sooo difficult! It's like finding a rattlesnake in the road: You know it's dangerous but you've just got to find a stick and poke it.
damn. that's what i get for staying away all weekend . . . i just figured her silly comment was a response to your posting the full copyright statement in the comments section.
still . . . though (to use a sinner-ism) i'm not a copyright attorney and i don't play one on tv, i'm pretty sure she's done a worse thing than not using the copyright symbol.
what an idiot.
can you believe you're still watching this? i can't believe i am. i think i may need an intervention.
Well, she certainly has done worse than not posting the little copyright symbol.
It's just sort of even more mind boggling(and I keep thinking it will never get to the next point, because dammmit it just can't!) but then she mocks a law firm that is already after her??
And re-words their legal disclaimer??!!
Dear God, this just can't be real.
But I've said this before.
sulla, you need to see my main blog which has been long neglected.
But that gives me a really good idea...
OttavaRima, sinner-ism... way cool!
That's a favorite, another is "back in the day".
Sinner;
"Have I mentioned today that the best way to end this thing is for all of us to refrain from visiting and commenting on the good Doctor's site?
STOP COMMENTING!"
Guy, what is the name of this blog?
What is the purpose of this blog?
To build an airtight, unsinkable, bullet-proof and armor-plated set of data to ensure that Deb Frisch is NEVER hired by any educational institution ANYWHERE.
Is this not so?
And what could POSSIBLY accomplish this goal better than the words of the Frisch herself?
Is this not also so?
Ergo, if people comment on her site, and she responds to those comments with the "cartoon music soundtrack" blasting inside her coconut at nosebleed levels, then we can point at the bigger explosions of malice, idiocy, and jaw-dropping self-delusion and chorus "Oh!" and "Ahhh" and "Wow!".
(You know, the old barroom "Wheel of Fortune" game.)
This site isn't about what's best for Frisch.
Frisch could give a shit about Frisch, so why should anyone else?
You said this site is about protecting the kids.
Far as I'm concerned, if she doesn't pick the shrink, she can have the prison, or she can "shotgun...apply directly to the brainstem".
Makes almost no difference to me, except that the "shotgun...apply directly to the brainstem" is a surefire way to ensure that the Goldstein family can forget about this venomous reptile and get on with their own lives.
Now, if she was sekking advertising, THAT would be a different story altogether.
Regards;
Bilgeman,
To build an airtight, unsinkable, bullet-proof and armor-plated set of data to ensure that Deb Frisch is NEVER hired by any educational institution ANYWHERE.
Is this not so?
Yes it is, don't you think that there is more than enough posted here to do that.
I want it to end, not for her but for Jeff and his family.
Sinner;
"I want it to end, not for her but for Jeff and his family."
Yes, and not just for them, but for all the other families out there.
When she does do herself in, that'll make a nice object lesson for any other reptile out there that sexualizes children.
Up until now, we've had to put "short eyes" in prison, and in general population, for society to practice the necessary hygiene and rid itself of such vermin, but if we can do that here in cyberspace...
I got no problem with that.
Regards;
..."Far as I'm concerned, if she doesn't pick the shrink, she can have the prison, or she can "shotgun...apply directly to the brainstem".
Makes almost no difference to me, except that the "shotgun...apply directly to the brainstem" is a surefire way to ensure that the Goldstein family can forget about this venomous reptile and get on with their own lives..."
Bilgeman, I see you are passionate about this issue, but please don't lose perspective. You make our side look just as bad as her side.
That comment is just as ugly as some of the things she has posted.
Of course the Goldstein family should not have to go thru this, but I don't think it warrants a death sentence.
I don't really like the "drive her to suicide" talk. I have said a number of times that I want her to be helped and stay away from teaching.
If it ends that way, I will feel very badly as opposed to her stated feelings toward Jeff and his family.
lunarpuff:
"Bilgeman, I see you are passionate about this issue, but please don't lose perspective. You make our side look just as bad as her side."
Let me get this straight.
The broad posts her pedophilic crap about a two year old, apologizes for it, but then claims she never posted it, despite bloggers nailing her IP as being responsible for both posts.
She writes and posts a poem, again, about the same two year old, which has debatably suggestive terms.
She apparently must have agreed, since she edited the poem after it was posted at least twice, and the suspect stanzas were deleted.
She "goes there" until folks make a stink, and then she retreats into her hole and tries to hide what she's done.
That's her MO...read the record.
Can you extrapolate where this behavior can lead?
Remember a clown named John Wayne Gacy? Why do you suppose he buried those boys beneath his house?
Just like this vermin, to hide what he had done so that he could represent as a loveable guy who did a clown schtick.
I have urged her, along with nearly every other sentient being in the known blogiverse, to put herself under a psychiatrist's care.
But when I point out that there IS a "suicide solution" for her, that's beyond the pale?
So, urging the option of suicide to people who publicly sexualize a toddler makes us "look bad"?
How?
And to whom?
I, for one, am SURE that this is about the children, and ONLY the welfare of the children...not about "looking good".
I could GAS how I "look".
If nothing else works, chum, then what?
She wants this solution anyway.
She knows exactly how fucked up she is.
She wants it to end too...probably more than any of us.
She's the one who has to live a life being Deb Frisch.
Regards;
Adapted from sinner's post....The best way to end this all is to allow the law to take its course. If in response the "good" doctor capers about, violates like mad the first rule of holes and wrecks her life beyond hope of repair, I'm not an altruist, she may go right ahead.
LET THE COMMENTS FLOW!
If you know someone who wants to comment at her site, con or even pro, let'em have the url. Give her a piece of your mind. Don't let your silence betoken consent to "teh crazy". No king's x for her. You're interested? You've got a good grip on life? Speak out.
Bilgeman,
Perhaps I should have worded that differently, but I believe my point was valid.
Dr. Deb deserves all that is being meted out to her. No questions, no amiguity about it.
I just don't like the death stuff.
I believe John Wayne Gacy raped, killed, and buried over 20 men. I'm not up on the details.
Words just fail me with things like that, so I won't even try.
What Deb has done is repulsive, reprehensible, disgusting and all of the other words that have been bandied about.
Jeff is taking the appropriate actions, and I am 100% on his side.
Comparing her to Gacy is just...
I won't go there.
I agree with you mostly, Bilgeman. I just wish you you would lay off the death penalty for this particular crime.
Whoops.
That's ambiguity and I promise to preview next time!
lunarpuff:
"I agree with you mostly, Bilgeman. I just wish you you would lay off the death penalty for this particular crime."
Ah, but it's not a death penalty if she does it herself, is it?
I s'pose I have a stronger stomach for snuffing the short-eyed than most people...maybe because I've sailed more than I should have to SE Asia...
"I won't go there."
Yes...don't. If you travel where I do, you see things that are corrosive to your soul.
Not for what you have done, but for what you SHOULD have done...and didn't.
"I believe John Wayne Gacy raped, killed, and buried over 20 men. I'm not up on the details."
That's right, Gacy abducted, raped, and murdered over 20 boys and men, and buried their bodies in the crawlspace under his house.
Of days, he would dress up as a clown and do childrens' parties.
But Gacy started with a first victim, didn't he?
How did he choose that first one?
Was it someone he'd just met? Or had he known and lusted after the lad for weeks...months...years?
Frisch claims she's a lesbian..."not wired for men"...okay, perhaps so for the sake of argument, I'll stipulate that.
But she doesn't seem to be able to make a long-term relationship work with a woman, does she?
And she's touchy about that aspect of her life.
One of the comments that "John Henry" made before she deleted it touched on her past relationship in Arizona.
She jumped on that and threatened to ban him...he touched a nerve.
So, Frisch don't like men, and can't make it last with women.
She gives her love to her dogs.
What's left to fill her empty bed with?
Your instinct for mercy does you credit, lunarpuff, but in this instance, it is misplaced.
Frisch merits mercy AFTER she commits herself to psychiatric treatment, not before.
For the kids' sakes.
Regards;
cool site, sinner! I'll visit often.
Presumably, the reason not to comment there is to avoid feeding her ego? What's the ego-feeding quotient on starting a blog dedicated to repeating her every word?
You're at your worst when you try to sound pious about this.
s.weasel,
I am not going to justify this blog to you. If you can't see what this is all about, you are blind or stupid.
I will respond to this:
You're at your worst when you try to sound pious about this.
Pious? Is that what I am?
From Dictionary.com:
4. Professing or exhibiting a strict, traditional sense of virtue and morality; high-minded.
5. Commendable; worthy: a pious effort.
Come to think of it, yes, I am pious on this subject. I am advocating a "traditional sense of virtue and morality". I am "high-minded". And yes, I believe this effort to be "worthy".
So, thanks for your feedback. What I don't get is why you think I am at my worst here, I will try harder to be more pious in the future.
Maybe we need a 12-step program?
1. We admitted we were powerless over Frisch, and that her insanity is unstoppable.
2. Came to believe that something other than Frish would restore her to sanity - preferrably the legal system.
Anyone else wanna join in?
how about:
3. made a decision to turn our browsers away from debfrisch.com and over to more edifying entertainment, as we understood it.
4. Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of Dr. Deb.
5. Admitted to Deb, the Web, and anyone who would listen, the exact nature of her wrongs.
so, what happens when you fail the 12-step plan?
i went back.
oh good golly, this is going to end up badly for her.
now she thinks she's off scott free and is convinced the TRO is frivolous b/c she never did two of the four things mentioned (phone JG or go to his house) and the other two (email to JG and posting on PW) could be prevented by JG himself if he'd only block her IP addy.
he chooses not to do that, therefore the TRO is frivolous.
oh, and she's apparently had a chat with a divorce attorney in CO who seems to be assuring her she has nothing to worry about.
too bad she didn't call a divorce attorney with a clue about how IP addresses work... you know dynamic, static, spoofed...
what an idiot. i must say i'm wondering what her plan is for parlaying this into a money-making adventure? google ads? but google doesn't allow google ads on pedophile sites or hate sites, do they? so she's probably out of luck there.
however, if she ever did set some sort of pay-per-click thing up on her site, that would be one sure-fire way of cutting her traffic back down to nil.
the only people who are going there are those who just want to see her get her comeuppance. (which, i admit, is small of me; oh well. there are worse things to be, i guess.)
but if i thought my clicking over to her site was resulting in a single penny in her pocket, i'd never go back again.
deb, if you're reading this, why don't you get in touch with google ads?
i'm very close to be awed by being able to witness what could be, quite possibly, the single biggest act of stupidity on the net since the thing was invented by al gore...all those many years ago.
i mean how does one type when one's jaw is laying on the keyboard?
what are we going to do when she is locked up? i mean, it's tough to find someone with a phd talking herself into jail in such a publicly pshycotic fashion.
i did try to talk sense but, well we know what we got for that...
just so no one else has to give her any hits to verify my last post here:
=====
"After consulting with Mr. John Haas, a lawyer affiliated with the denver firm pendleton, etc. I decided it was not cost effective to pursue legal action against Mr. Jeffrey Todd Goldstein.
After consulting with Mr. Paul Davis, a lawyer affiliated with the denver firm moet/white, Count Cockula decided it was cost-effective to pursue legal action against me.
I have been served with a temporary restraining order, approved by a Judge Vollock in Denver, Colorado. The restraining order submitted by Moet/White and approved by Judge Vollock has wasted the resources of the sheriff of lane county and it will waste my time and money if I choose to come to Denver to fight it.
Two of the four conditions of the restraining order are things I HAVE NEVER DONE. I never called Mr. G. I ain't never been within 100 yards of his abode, unless he lives REALLY close to the United Terminal at the airport.
Two of the actions I'm prohibited to engage in thanks to Misters Goldstein, Lewis and Vollock are things Mr. Goldstein could prohibit me from doing with a click of his mouse. He can set his email to automatically delete emails from me. He can set his blog so that it will ban emails from my IP address.
This is a frivolous lawsuit and I must show up in Denver on August 15 to avenge my good name. I also need to figure out a way to sue Moet/White and file an official complaint against vollock the dingbat.
I chatted briefly with a lawyer named Eric Ruderman [ed. here, she links to http://tinyurl.com/fx68w] that was the first one I called after googling denver, lawyer, restraining order.
It's time to start looking into purchasing a ticket on United, renting a car and reserving rooms in inns in boulder and ?????
Where should I go on a three or four day rocky mountain road trip?
Legal and travel advice welcome."
=======
hey! when you put it that way, twocow... hmm. i don't feel so bad anymore about my little addiction.
yes. i'll be able to say i watched it all unfold in real time. not that anyone will ever know or care... but it makes me feel better anyway.
wonder if she knows you don't get paid to be on the receiving end of that sharp colbert ridicule and sarcasm?
yeah, i doubt we'll be telling our grandkids about the unhinged moonbat know as deb. but dang if it ain't inspiring to see someone put so much energy into being stupid. i know i couldn't. she is definately on a different level.
I almost expect Jeff to come out and say this was all a joke. I actually thought, eh, Monday, she's going to be posting about how she hates Dubya and never mention this again. But no, it's worse!
Where are her family members and friends?!!!
And it is amazing how many people have tried to help her, even the lawyers. And I thought they weren supposed to be the snakes.
Post a Comment
<< Home