OK, I know Ihave said this before, but...
http://debfrisch.com/archives/2006/08/tdyke_tawk.html
THIS IS JUST PLAIN CREEPY
t(d)yke tawkThis comming from a guy that talks to his coffee... man that's gotta hurt.
Tyke: u r cray zee.
D: u r 2.
T: olive u.
D: olive u 2.
T: y donchu lik my daddy-o?
D: long stow ree.
T: y donchu lik my mommy-o?
D: I dough know ur mommy-o.
T: but u make funna her.
D: that’s just because of your daddy-o.
T: I don’t understand.
D: maybe you’ll get it when u r 3.
T: u r cray zee.
D: eye no.
T: u r my anti-moonbat.
D: no. your daddy-o’s the anti-moonbat. I’m auntie moonbat. big difference, little hombre. trust me.
T: olive u, auntie moonbat.
D: olive u 2, grasshopper.
T: u got da kung fu thang goin?
D: u goddit.
T: ‘Night Jon Boy.
D: ‘Night Mary Ellen.
T: Peace.
D: Piece.
posted by Sinner @ 5:22 AM
10 comments
10 Comments:
Sinner;
"THIS IS JUST PLAIN CREEPYt(d)yke tawk"
Me wonders if this isn't what happens when childless lesbians begin going through menopause.
Frisch is at the age for "change of life".
God knows it seems to be hard enough on a straight woman who already HAS a family...can you imagine running out of eggs and realizing that you've given up your chance to have a biological family of your own?
If it were me, I'd be lipschitz just about having to deal with DECADES of menstruation, and with nothing to show for my troubles.
She does seem to have a maternal instinct, one that she's transferred onto her dogs.
She does dote about them, doesn't she?
Noticed that she attacked Goldstein's wife and child...?
Didja know that Goldstein was a REAL professor who gave it up to be Mr. Mom?
Frisch must be insanely jealous of him. Professionally, HE had what SHE wanted.
Family-wise, he has what she will never achieve.
And she does so seem to enjoy posting in "baby-talk"...although she might also be emotionally regressing.
Regards;
You might want to check the comments here as well. This is where she went off about Stephen Bainbridge being a closeted homosexual. She's truly insane.
And this post for some total lunacy.
She has since deleed the part where she admits to being insane, and referrencing a "piece" of Satch. Gee...I wonder why?
Well, the text here will serve as the original then...
hosedragger:She has since deleed the part where she admits to being insane, and referrencing a "piece" of Satch. Gee...I wonder why?
This is exactly why I am still debating the deletion of a previous post here.
Sinner, stop teasing us about that previous post.
And Bilgeman, you are having way to much fun with this, LOL.
I noticed on her sitemeter, there were several .edu sites reading her verbal sewage.
You know, I kind of am starting to feel sorry for her. But you know, when she starts going back to being just stupid and loses the attention her insanity brings, she will just go back to being insane. Boy, does she need help.
And as a rule, I am NOT going near a computer this weekend. I am way to addicted to this lady's descent into madness.
Staci:
"Bilgeman, you are having way to much fun with this,"
The way real estate has been developing round these parts, it's hard to get a good fox hunt going anymore.
Haven't ridden to the hounds in AGES.
"LOL."
Glad you're enjoying a bit of it also.
Like I told Frisch...I'm a fuckin' "people person".
Regards;
I can email the cotents to you staci, if you email me at sinsblog@softhome.net
Thanks Timothy for the links to her posts at Deinonychus Antirrhopus. This one is the smoking gun to her true insanity, IMHO:
Do you hate and despise Dubya?
Do you believe he is the anti-Christ, even if you don't believe in Christian mumbo jumbo?
Would you buy a magnum of Dom Perignon or Opus One or Ridge Zinfandel if you learned he'd choked on a pretzel and croaked?
If you do not answer YES!!!!! to all these questions, then from where I stand, you're a rabid republican, even if you're pro-choice and anti-war.
Posted by: df on February 9, 2005 09:07 PM
I have to say I have never stared at a computer screen with my jaw hanging open as long as I did to that little admission (and I used to hang out quite a bit in the darker rhelms of the Usenet!), and I still do not want to believe that Ms. Moonbat really means what she says there. However, judging by her actions of late, it must be the truth. Or at least as close to truth as she is able at this point.
Completely mindboggling, that a presummedly non-institutionalized, educated, at-one-time productively working member of this society would discuss what beverage to drink in celebration of the death of another person (oh, that's right, she said that Jeff, Steve, Ace, Matt et al, are "not even human" to her on other occasions!), not to mention that fact that one has to believe in the current physical presence of a spiritual entity that one does not believe actually exists, in order to meet her particular worldview.
That last goalpost claim carries so many theological and psychological possibilities that I dare say someone could satisfy a dissertation committee with a simple annotated chronological listing!
I must admit it has also been a guilty pleasure over the past month or so, watching Ms. Moonbat insult a whole host of people by her obscenity laced rants that economists don't know anything about economics, law professors don't know anything about the law, special operations operators are "fake warriors," political scientists don't know anything about politics, full professor chairs of university departments don't know what they are doing on even a basic level, and on and on with so many others not knowing anything about their chosen and active professions, all of this based on the complete superiority in all things she earned through her now-former, troubled and ultimately unsuccessful adjuntive teaching career in the pseudo-science of "decision making." (Miller Brewing Company summed up all you really need to know about her chosen field of interest: "Tastes Great" vs. "Less Filling")
My, my, my. I am half tempted to reach through the bars and poke her with what my own profession is, just so she would shriek at me some amusing tagline, that I could then hang under the old shingle.
But that would be wrong.
Post a Comment
<< Home