Dittos Fred!
Definitely there is need for more of teh crazy here if you expect me to keep reading. I'm not just talking about the normal, background-level crazy you keep running all the time, I'm talking about the full-on crazy that brought me to your blog in the first place...so please, more crazy.Isn't it well past time for another jaw-dropping, eye-popping, side-splitting act of teh crazy?
Posted by Fred Thompson at August 8, 2006 10:33 AM
Man, I had to resort to Caddyshack jokes to keep my interest up...
Anyone think that maybe the good Doctor is starting to see the light and cutting back on teh crazy on purpose? Did Denny finally get through? Did she actually get some lawyer to talk to her? Will Aunt Martha finally get out of that ditch?
These questions answered and more on the next episode of as the PhD turns!
posted by Sinner @ 11:16 AM
16 comments
16 Comments:
Nah, it's still early in the week. Remember her drinking cycle?
Right... Thursday it is!
Trust Doctur Frisch:
"if you contact me via an edu email at my pobox address, i will treat your email as 100% confidential. i will not quote it here or refer to it here."
Riiiiiight, and then:
"all contact is welcome, regardless of affective tone. ask dr. s @ psych.princeton if you do not believe me."
As untrustworthy as she is meshuggah.
Regards;
Those are to dot-edu addresses only. She's got hits now from all over the academosphere, including several from Palo Alto, home of Stanford University, where Barbara Tversky is a professor and Amos Tversky was until his death in ... She's cut this she'd written from a comment (but if you hit the "continue reading" it's still there:
"my crime in my research was similar, but metaphorical.
i didn't pretend danny kahneman and amos tversky were gods. I stood up to their shenanigans the way lola lopes did. and of course, i said no when amos tried to convince me to hump him. who knows - maybe he was one of my "anonymous reviewers" and badmouthed my research because he was pissed I said no to his manipulative, disgusting, philanderous offer"
The Bowdlerized version:
"my crime in my research was similar, but metaphorical.
i didn't pretend danny kahneman and amos tversky were gods. I stood up to their shenanigans the way lola lopes did"
Geez. I can't turn this loose. Maybe I do need an intervention.
Dangnabbit. Amos Tversky died in 1996.
Does anyone notice that Frisch has a real hard-on against Jewish men?
Me wonders how she got along with her father.
Regards;
Don't worry Sinner, the comments will keep it fun until her approaching mid week drinking/meth binge.
Check this out:
___________________________________
My friend Joseph Caramango is an attorney here in Las Vegas. He is interested in talking to you. Call before 5 P.M. Las Vegas time.
Posted by Josephine at August 8, 2006 11:13 AM
___________________________________
That of course refers to THIS lawyer:
"A judge ordered a blood-alcohol test for a defense lawyer whom she said smelled of alcohol, then declared a mistrial after declaring him too tipsy to argue a kidnapping case. "
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/08/08/D8JCBRM80.html
Even funnier is the name of the poster.
"Caramango also identified a woman who accompanied him to court as his ex-girlfriend, and called her Christine. Questioned by the judge, the woman identified herself as Josephine and said she just met Caramango about 20 minutes earlier at a nearby bar and grill."
I suspect the Palo Altons are not emailing her in any positive manner. A whole post referenced on this site disappeared from her site this am.
As unbalanced as she appears to be, it's my opinion that she has been gaming for the last week to boost her ego with site hits and comments. She was surprised by the TRO, but still has enough clarity to stay out of Denver amd Colorado. She has and never had any intention of going to the hearing in Denver. All the BS about it and the verbal attacks on the judge and Mr Goldstein's attorney have just been her idea of theater along with the insults and ridicule of the authors of the well-intentioned legal advice she has been getting. You'll notice that she isn't getting any more at this point.
Her legal Achilles heel is not her belief that by staying in Oregon she insulates herself from the consequences of jumping back and forth over the line drawn by the TRO. If she is present at the hearing, she could be remanded to custody for a month or at most 3. If she is not present at the hearing, it's unlikely that a warrant would be drawn up. She may be surprised there, but it's unlikely. The TRO would become permanent and she would be summoned to another hearing she will not have the option of ignoring, but no warrant from the hearing on the 15th unless she really tanks in the next week.
Her exposure to a civil suit is another matter. If Mr Goldstein is so inclined, and his attorney so advises, a very likely circumstance as his professional personna has been repeatedly savaged by Ms Frisch, I see enough there to go with.
The best course of action that anyone can take on Mr Goldstein's behalf at this point is not to comment at her site in any posts not directly related to the TRO or the possibility of a civil suit. If she does not get comments to her posts on other matters, she will return to baiting for comments about her legal issues and further prejudice her position.
SanBerdooLou
Sound reasoning and advice!
Welcome!
"aushwitzing beirut" seems pretty craaazy to me.
Denny said,
"Nah, it's still early in the week. Remember her drinking cycle?"
I have to agree. Worse yet, it feels like there's something I'm not quite catching when she's on her meds during the week.
"...it feels like there's something I'm not quite catching..."
There certainly is something I am not catching. I've felt that way since the TRO was served. Dismissing Ms Frisch as clueless is probably not a safe assumption. We only read what she chooses to reveal about her machinations and reasoning. Is she unbalanced but lucid? I think she may be. I think she has some sort of plan. She is too volatile to rigorously follow it, but she does return to it periodically. It's probably a foolish plan, but it's there somewhere.
Ah, she can at least do research here, because that backdoor to that unedited version of the comment is now gone and only the bowdlerized version remains. She is doing exactly what she accused Goldstein, wrongly, of. She is a hypocrite.
Did anyone else see the comments Blizzardlane is talking about?
Anyone care to write a guest front-page post on that?
Yeah, I saw that comment.
Also, someone busted her on it based on a March 8 ? 2005 post that is still up over there.
Correction:
Her conflicting posts were March 7 and September 14, 2005.
Post a Comment
<< Home